"either allow their stuff to be stolen or leave" - I didn't say that, and I didn't mean that. I was implying that we can't determine who's right with 100% accuracy and, therefore members can't claim that we should perform certain actions until there's legal order to do so.
I realize that in 99,999999% of the cases this won't go as far as to substantiate in a court order, so it's more common sense and good practices that should moderate Unity. So, like I said in my post, we will go by see more common sense.
I am trying to stop the flood of "remove this immediately" emails clogging my inbox.
I supplied VictorT a couple months back, at the time of the strike, of e-mails in my expertzzz.com inbox that displayed [edited out by Andrew Boon]. Nothing happened. Others have done this with him and you guys claim that he agreed to not do it again, apologized and so on. While we show he is still doing it nothing happens. The apologies are nothing but false promises given with a smirk.
In regards to your post, that is how it was perceived by myself and many others. You know that the vast see more majority of these guys can't get this into a courtroom due to lack of funds and such to go through the legal process. It's harder in most places than it is here in the US. But when you take money from us in exchange for the right to post mods then you are assuming a certain amount of responsibility for what is being posted. Many times you can just look at the date the mod was posted and make the logical conclusion beyond a "reasonable doubt" as to what belongs to whom. A closer look and it's becomes blatant when the words of one when compared to the other and posting dates as to ownership rights.
In the end, we the members of this community, provide the support to this community and we do it for free, when those members feel they are being dumped on then it becomes less agreeable for them to continue to provide the support that they have been providing, at which point Boonex will have to step up and begin to foot the bill for the agents to do it.
I realize that in 99,999999% of the cases this won't go as far as to substantiate in a court order, so it's more common sense and good practices that should moderate Unity. So, like I said in my post, we will go by see more
In regards to your post, that is how it was perceived by myself and many others. You know that the vast see more