You have developed a highly modified version of D6.1.6. It is a good site. I know this because I looked at it when Houston was accusing you of being "a spammer" after you made a blog post telling us how proud you were of it, and happy you were with the technology. Now you are here mocking people who have taken a different approach - calling us the "I want it now" crowd and saying our opinions should not be respected and we "should just be ignored".
Should I remind see more you that there was a time when your opinions weren't respected - to the extent that Boonex was forced to delete your post - even though you were essentially praising them? You might have been the last one here to make a heavily modified D6 site - so I doubt that upgrading to D7 will not be all that easy. With Andrew now saying the beta that was supposed to be ready last week will now be ready next week, would you advise anyone to take your same approach? - i.e. to heavily modify a D6 site? When everyone has their D7 sites working, and it turns out that there is some feature you want, would you like people to mock you and say you were a fool to modify a D6 site just before the new release, and that you should "just be ignored". Think about it.
Should I remind see more