I didn't even know there was an unauthorized election for Unity Moderator but I might as well throw my hat into the ring. VOTE FOR ME! Why? because I am totally LAZY! That's right, as your moderator, I would do hardly anything at all - I probably won't ever read most of the posts.
When a really nasty post comes to my attention - one that contains a personal attack or foul language, I will simply delete it - when I get around to it. If a thread gets long and boorish I'll close it but leave it there (if the forum even has this tool? - I don't know). Let me give you an example of how I would moderate this hypothetical post - and you should ask the other moderator candidates how they would handle this also as it is a good test:
--
DOLPHIN SUCKS!
I tried to install Dolphin last night and the bloody thing doesn't work! Who are the idiots who made this software? You all must be morons for using this crap! Go to bloody hell all of you!
--
Now what would you do with this post? Reasonable people can disagree, but I would just leave it there. Not because I like the message, but because I will probably be too lazy to get around to deleting it. Eventually I would get around to deleting it - if it had no other useful information, but by then members would have had a chance to read it and weigh in first.
That post, by the way, is an approximation of a real post that appeared on the forums not too long ago. The poster later came back and apologized admitting that he drunk (PUI - posting while intoxicated - never a good idea). A more diligent moderator would have deleted the thread, along with some of the insightful responses, and banned this member. A lazy moderator, on the other hand would likely just let it slide - and by the time he got around to doing anything the situation would have likely resolved itself.
In your heart-of-hearts you know it is true. If Boonex needs a moderator now, then it should be a LAZY moderator. That is why you should vote for me!
Rob
You totally get my vote, Bro! - But tell me "Just How Lazy Are You?" - We might consider someone who can't remember a darn thing also.
Juker
To become a moderator, you must first be a Pundit.
See the following:
http://www.boonex.com/unity/txt/membership
Take note of this "Step-by-step rule: you can only upgrade to Expert if you're a Contributor, to Pundit if you're an Expert and to Moderator if you're a Pundit. Hence, every Pundit is a Member, Contributor and Expert. see more
...sip...
The value of this particular post is close to zilch. On the other hand, I will grudgingly admit that the guy (because it was a guy from the UK who posted it) was entitled to say his beef (as long as it was not laced with profanity).
We should have a CATTLE AND BEEF (or something like that) area in see more
Regards,
DosDawg
You are going to do what?
(He is joking...)
j'ai rien compris alors avec le traducteur
désolé
Merci MichelSwiss
and yes by the way i like the idea on focusing on the forum as well, or finding a way to make it distinct between the two; blog and forum, since both are usefull.
im glad also to see how things go here, im sure this will help me to anticipate any kind of crisis in my site.
I think you'll make a damn fine moderator.
I am definitely against this, I personally think you lack the ability to seperate your personal feelings and view things objectively, which is a vital requirement of a moderator.
I personally think you would be a very poor moderator and I'm voting against you.