Social Networking

DeeEmm posted 25th of May 2009 in Community Voice. 9 comments.

Once upon a time, waaay back before computers were commonplace, the accepted way to socially interact with other people was to go to a public venue such as a public house, and chat to your freinds and acquaintances about your day / week / month whilst sharing a drink or a meal.

A typical evening would have involved drinking a few beers or glasses of house wine whilst exchanging amusing stories and anecdotes about your week at work and what an idiot your boss / co-worker / mother-in-law was.

It was generally accepted as rude to shout at people whilst socializing with them and even ruder to swear at them. Usually only the very drunk would use this behavior which would generally tend to get you either thrown out or dragged outside for a punch up (or both - depending on which establishment you frequented).

New friends were made, old friends passed by, but everyone always followed the basic rules of social etiquette.

This was the way were brought up - to show respect for others, and to be polite. 'Good manners cost nothing' as my mum would often say.

Fast forward to 2009.

Computers are now commonplace, many spend more time interacting with their PC's than with real people. Some so much so that their online persona (read: alter ego) is much larger then themselves. Pretty soon people are not going to know how to function in a normal society  - and the recent behavior of some in this community echo's scary proof of that.

For those of you who swear, flame and generally belittle people - if that same person was standing in front of you - would you speak to them the same way??

I doubt it!

Everyone is entitled to thier own opinion, and there is nothing wrong with a little rhetoric or constructive criticism to keep the creative spark ignighted, but downright rudeness is just not acceptable, remember, there are actually some basic rules of social etiquette, regardless of where the socialising is taking place - why not stop to consider them.

Remember, good manners cost nothing.

DM.

 
Comments
·Oldest
·Top
Please login to post a comment.
Project198
Real good post.. My hat off to you!
CALTRADE
Did you ever notice that this kind of behavior is FAR more commonplace with sites that accept or encourage "anonymous communication"? Sites that use real names seldom have this issue - you almost never see people posting huge outbursts of obscenity on Linkedin - or Facebook for that matter. Anyone can find my real identity with a mouse click or two, but many people here have some play username, like "DarkAvenger" or something, some cartoon character avatar and a vague or non-descriptive see more profile. I believe this is part of the "culture" of an online community that is established shortly after it launches - and is tough to change. If a site starts with fake names, it would be difficult to encourage people to ever put in their real names.

If a site has the first 10 or 20 people post real photos, it is far more likely that others will post real photos. If, on the other hand, a site starts with cartoon characters for photos, then it will be much more difficult to get anyone to post real photos. Boonex, because of the way it was initially set up, is now mostly a fake name site. Because of the recent drama created on some of these posts, this site is now even generating fake profiles and attempts to game the voting system. No offense to people who like sites to be anonymous for one reason or another, and do not use their anonymity as an excuse to launch personal attacks, but this doesn't happen with sites that use real names.
Andrew Boon
I agree and believe that anonymity often kills manners. Unity should have been set up to use real names with an option to stay anonymous for people who don't want to post anything in public. We might have to think again about it.

On the other hand, some may see it as potential threat to their personas.

Linkedin is a good example, though.
DosDawg
i dont think it matters in reality who you are, if you use a real name or a screen name, an avatar or a picture of your mother in law, the person you are will be reflected in how you treat people in general. as to who you are and hiding your identity, that is personal preference, and there are many who choose to remain unidentified. my screenname is what it is, because that was something that i was tagged with back before there were a social network, heck for that matter before there was really an see more internet, or windows :). i have been using a computer online for most of the past 25 years, and i have seen many changes in the etiquette online. it really used to not matter, what your real name was or is, and for that matter, it really doesnt today, screen names or usernames have been a part of the internet for some period of time. its when those who have the bright idea to create multiple screen names with no accountability to the primary screenname, that things get out of hand.

yes linked is more of a business social environment, and nobody there has a problem with revealing who they are, or at least that is the way we perceive that to be. but can you be ensured that john johnson is really john johnson. no you cannot! that is still an assumed name or screen name, and we have no real faction in knowing anybody's true identity ever.

IMHO, if you choose to hide who you are, then you are doing that by choice and you have something to hide would be my belief. of course you get into the whole conflict with identity theft when you reveal too much information, and people (crooks by nature) tend to have more scams available to them, when a person uses their real name. but in general, you are who you are, and a screenname, or alias will not change that.

Regards,
DosDawg
houstonlively
I don't know that using real names will make any difference. If someone doesn't want to use their real name, they'll just make one up. The only reason real names work anywhere, is because people want to use their real name, and want others to know who they are. I'm not sure that applies here in most cases.
I'm not really here to do social networking; I'm here because this is meant to be the premier site for info on Dolphin and Boonex products. To me this is a Boonex resource site, not a social networking site per se.

Having said that, of course that doesn't mean I cease being civil and professional with people I interact with here. But it does go to the heart of why I chose not to use my own name here and not to reveal too much of my own identity.

And, to be honest, given the state of Unity see more (flamings, bickerings, revealing personal details of other people, scams and frauds perpetrated by other members, etc), I have no regret having done so. Sorry, but I just don't trust this site enough to "come out". I suspect many potential new Unity members will feel the same way.

And not using my real name or revealing much about my own identity does not diminish, I don't think, the value of my posts here.
I should say: scams and frauds perpetrated by a few members.
DosDawg
you are in fact here to network. if not then you are here just trolling. there are a lot of members who are on this site that troll, they never announce their presence. you on the other hand have had an active voice, and therefore, would be socially networking.

Regards,
DosDawg
If you have the right type of community in mind you can make sure you have met all your communitiy members in real life before they join or encourage group meet ups after they join
 
 
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
PET:0.09227991104126