Boonex 2.0

tomakali posted 15th of April 2010 in Community Voice. 6 comments.

Boonex 1.0 was great so far and have provided their best in all that what they did.

BUT...

As the technology expands, competition presurizes, challenges threatens

i and most of unity members FEEL that we Boonex should upgrade itself to 2.0 and not 1.01.

And this is not about Boonex.com, but the Boonex management, staff, support, development etc

Say, Google Adsense is a great program with the best of idiotic rules.

No direct support, only forum support, no questions asked policies etc

Still, it rules because of 95% bug free

because the % of bugs are less the need for direct support is less.

in case of our relationship with boonex we[site admin] are tied up with various factors like boonex developers, boonex support, unity modders, website members etc.

at many times when we face a bug in our website we are confused on where to take the bug to, to get it fixed.

and finally we are made to wait 45+ days in the queue to get a bug fix release, by then most of our members are gone to some bs.com

whether or not boonex is following any sdlc, there are lots of questions on why?

1.boonex development is 200% slower than others? [order a trident clone at scriptcopy.com, we can get it in 45 days, where as it takes 2190 days to develop]

is there any separate teams for D7,trident,mobile apps etc? why same people working on everything?

2. boonex is not concentrating on support directly? [any new member after 30 days will be scared enough not to pay and buy license because BUGS, No-Support, Waiting, frustration, disappointment are all the added features of anything that comes out of boonex, be it a bug-fix, beta, rc, whatever]

We love Boonex

But the best efforts of boonex is not friendly to site owners.

Development            - 5/10

Support                    - 4/10

Features                   - 6/10

Satisfaction                - 5/10

Terror                       - 8/10 [everyday when i wakeup, i bootup to see my site and sigh! Thank god, my site is still running...]

Love                         - 9/10 [and thats what keeps us here in unity]

Expected Boonex 2.0

Separate teams for all projects

[Dolphin 7 Developers,support,trac,agents etc]

[Dolphin7 Mobile Developers,support,trac,agents etc]

[Trident Developers,support,trac,agents etc]

[Unity Market Developers,support,agents etc]

if any one who does exist in more than 1 team... [Too many cooks...]

 
Comments
·Oldest
·Top
Please login to post a comment.
CodeSatori
If you're fast, you can create a Trident-ish framework in three to six months with a bit of meat on the bones, but unless you have a dozen people doing it (or a couple of very proficient folks who have already coded something very similar in the past), no way on earth you get a Trident framework + module suite out in 45 days.

That aside, there's no point talking about Boonex 2.0 until Boonex has resources for going 2.0. In practice it means hiring at least six to ten additional qualified staff see more members. If you're willing to inve$t a couple of hundred thousand monies into it, I'm sure they will bend backwards to go 2.0 for you.
CALTRADE
What is all this sudden talk about "Trident" - what is it anyway? - besides the next version? D7 still doesn't have its basic functions working yet - the last thing that should happen is any emphasis on some pie-in-the-sky future version. Many of us still have the painful memory of putting off modding our D6 sites for more than a year because D7 was "a few weeks off". I don't even want to hear about this "Trident" thing.
ydrargyros
@Caltrade
totally true...all this love for the Trident is similar to the Next Big Thing frenzy, and we all know how this worked out for clients and the community,

Instead of dreaming of Trident, which we really have no idea what it shall be like, and of course judging by D7, it's potential bug list, we should all discuss of the key features missing from D7, the hard coded design material and many GUI issues there are...
CodeSatori
Trident should be some sort of a slick and smart CMS framework as far as I've understood. Reading up at http://blog.datingadnetwork.com/interview-with-boonex/ --- some key phrases that interest me, quoting:

- 100% separation of core and functional modules -> a lot more stable and secure core
- Top-notch templating and language systems
- Developed from the ground up with millions of users in mind
- Support for 3-rd party modules/apps the same as native plugins

These are all stuff I've see more been chewing on myself since over a year with some of my own projects, and I think they would dramatically improve the Dolphin experience for both developers and end-users. Good architecture is everything.
ydrargyros
ahmmm... and i thought that Dolphin was supposed to have all these! :P
tomakali
it would be nice to shout something about "expected boonex management" forget about D7,trident whatsoever.
steal andrew's shoes and put on it and say something from your mind on "what would you do to re-invent all the operations of Boonex under your command"

Man, im gonna screwed for this...
 
 
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
PET:0.10556292533875